CRITICAL Group Size: 5–500 Long-term

Community Organization & Governance

How to form, organize, govern, and sustain a community through extended crisis. Includes printable templates for charters, skill inventories, and trade ledgers.

Day One Priorities — Before Anything Else:
  1. Establish who makes decisions in an emergency (single leader or small council) — ambiguity in crisis = paralysis or conflict
  2. Agree on and write down 5–10 non-negotiable rules that apply to everyone including leaders
  3. Conduct a skill inventory of everyone present (use template at bottom of this page)
  4. Assign minimum roles: medical, security, food/water, communications
  5. Establish a daily group meeting time — even 15 minutes prevents information asymmetry

1. Forming a Group

Optimal Group Size — What the Research Shows

Group size is not arbitrary — it has profound effects on trust, communication overhead, decision speed, and social cohesion. The research converges on natural size thresholds:

5
Support clique (close confidants)
15
Sympathy group (genuine trust)
50
Military unit / hunting band (functional team)
150
Dunbar's Number — maximum stable social group without formal hierarchy
500
Village / tribe — requires formal laws and governance structures
Group SizeGovernance NeededHistorical ParallelKey Challenge
2–10Informal consensus; one trusted leader for emergenciesNuclear family, small teamResource pooling, avoiding cliques
10–50Council of 3–5; clear role assignments; weekly meetingsMilitary squad/platoon, Viking ship crewEquitable labor distribution, free rider problem
50–150Formal council, written rules, defined roles, property systemMedieval village, kibbutz foundingSub-group formation, rumor management
150–500Representative democracy or meritocracy; written law; judiciary functionEarly New England town, Althing IcelandCorruption, rule of law enforcement
500+Full government structure; professional roles; taxation/resource allocationSmall city-state, frontier townLegitimacy, defense, inter-group trade
The Free Rider Problem: In any group above 10 people, some individuals will consume resources without contributing proportionally. This is not laziness — it is a predictable social behavior documented across every human culture. Your governance system MUST account for it explicitly or resentment will fracture the group within weeks.

2. Critical Roles Every Group Needs

Assign these roles on Day One. One person can hold multiple roles in small groups. Write down the current role holder and at least one backup for each.

Medical Officer

Triage, wound care, medication management, disease surveillance, quarantine decisions. Backup is mandatory — the medic will become ill too. Highest priority skill for recruiting.

Security Lead

Perimeter watch scheduling, threat assessment, patrol coordination, weapons discipline, incident response. Must have clear authority in immediate threat situations — committees don't work under fire.

Logistics

Supply inventory, consumption tracking, scavenging coordination, tool maintenance, resource allocation. Must be trusted by everyone — controls access to food, water, and medical supplies.

Communications

Radio operation, information gathering, external contact management, intelligence assessment. Controls what information enters and leaves the group — position of significant power.

Agriculture Lead

Food production planning, planting calendar, soil management, water systems, animal husbandry. The most important long-term role; undervalued in crisis's first weeks, critical from month 2 onward.

Council Lead / Facilitator

Meeting facilitation, dispute escalation point, external negotiations, charter enforcement. Not necessarily the "leader" in the military sense — the role is procedural, not hierarchical.

Education / Records

Children's schooling, knowledge documentation, library management, skill training coordination. Often neglected; critical for multi-year sustainability and morale.

Construction / Engineering

Shelter repair, infrastructure, tools, mechanical repair, sanitation systems. Irreplaceable during the first winter. Identify all mechanical aptitudes in skill inventory.

3. Vetting Strangers — Trust-Building Protocol

The Fundamental Tension

Two real facts exist simultaneously: (1) Every group of survivors needs more skilled people; (2) A bad actor inside the perimeter is more dangerous than 10 outside it. Your vetting protocol must balance genuine hospitality with reasonable security. Blanket refusal of all strangers is short-sighted; blanket acceptance is reckless.

Arrival Protocol

  1. Initial contact at distance — have one greeter with visual backup (security not visible to newcomer). Observe clothing, body language, direction of approach, who/what is behind them. They may be a scout.
  2. Brief interview outside perimeter — name, where they came from, who they were with, what happened. Note inconsistencies in the story. Offer water (observe how they handle it — is it for themselves or children first?). Listen more than you talk.
  3. Decision: turn away, observe hold, or provisional admission — turn away if obvious threat indicators; put into observe hold (separate shelter, no internal access) for 24–72 hours minimum; provisional admission with escort for assessed low-risk individuals with strong skills.
  4. Observe hold — separate from main group. Provide food and water. Rotate who interacts with them — inconsistency in stories emerges over time. Observe how they treat the animals, children, and lower-status group members.
  5. Probationary membership — if admitted after observe hold, 30-day probationary period with no access to supply storage, weapons cache, or sensitive group information (secondary location, radio codes, route plans).
  6. Full membership — full council vote after probationary period. No single person can grant full membership.

Information Compartmentalization

Non-Negotiable Day-One Rules

Write these down and have everyone sign or thumb-print them within 24 hours of group formation:

  1. No violence against group members. Any physical assault (except in self-defense against immediate attack) triggers mandatory council review with exile as the possible outcome.
  2. No theft from group stores. Discovery triggers mandatory council review. Second offense = exile.
  3. No rape or sexual assault. Exile on first finding. No exceptions, no probation.
  4. No unilateral decisions that affect the whole group. Any action with group-wide consequences requires council notification before execution if time allows, or immediate reporting if not.
  5. Everyone contributes to essential work. No exceptions for status, age (within reason), or prior social position. Work assignments are posted and tracked.
  6. Medical resources are allocated by medical officer, not by social position. The medic's triage decisions are final in medical emergencies.
  7. Truth-telling. Deliberate deception of the group on matters affecting security, health, or resources is grounds for exile review.
  8. Security protocol compliance. Security lead's decisions during a threat are immediate orders, not suggestions.
  9. Child protection. All children are under community protection regardless of parentage.
  10. No hoarding. Private stores must be declared to logistics; exception: a personal small reserve (defined by council) is permitted.

4. Governance Models

Council Model

Best for: Groups of 15–150 where diverse skill domains require represented input.

Structure: 3–7 members elected or selected by role (medical lead, security lead, logistics, agriculture, and 1–2 at-large). Rotating chair. Decisions by majority vote; supermajority (2/3) required for exile, charter amendment, or major resource reallocation.

Quorum: Minimum 3 members or 60% of council, whichever is higher, for binding decisions.

Veto: Medical officer has veto on health-related decisions. Security lead has veto on immediate tactical decisions. Veto can be overridden by unanimous remaining council vote.

Historical examples: Swiss Landsgemeinde (open-air assembly voting), medieval English village manor courts, New England town meetings.

Meritocracy / Domain Authority Model

Best for: Small groups (5–30) with clear skill differentiation where speed of decision matters.

Structure: Each domain leader has full authority within their domain. Medical officer controls all medical decisions. Security lead controls all security operations. Agriculture lead controls planting and harvest decisions. Council convenes only for cross-domain decisions and disputes.

Risk: Domain leaders can become de facto autocrats. Mitigate with mandatory cross-domain consultation for decisions affecting resources above a defined threshold (e.g., any decision affecting more than 20% of a category of supplies requires council input).

Hybrid Model (Recommended)

Best for: Most groups; adapts to size changes.

Structure: Domain meritocracy for day-to-day operations. Council for strategic decisions (resource allocation, membership, charter). Emergency executive authority vested in single leader (rotate monthly or elect term) for immediate-threat scenarios only, automatically reverts to council within 48 hours. Written procedure for when emergency executive authority activates — never leave this undefined.

Scaling by Group Size

SizeModelMeeting FrequencyKey Structure
2–10Informal consensusDaily brief; as-needed for decisionsDesignated emergency decision maker; no formal council needed yet
10–50Hybrid: domain leads + small council (3)Weekly formal + daily briefWritten rules, posted work assignments, weekly resource report
50–150Council (5–7) with domain leadsBiweekly formal + weekly briefWritten charter, formal membership, property registry, trade ledger
150–500Representative council + judiciaryMonthly assembly + weekly councilSub-neighborhood organization, professional roles, labor taxation

Historical Models Worth Studying

ModelOriginWhat It Got RightWhat Failed
Althing (Iceland, 930 AD)Norse settlers; 930 CEOpen assembly where any free man could speak; no king; consensus-building over coercion; lasted 300+ yearsNo enforcement mechanism — powerful clans ignored judgments
Iroquois ConfederacyNortheast North America, pre-1500Consensus requirement for major decisions; women held veto power; clear confederation structure allowing local autonomy; influenced US ConstitutionConfederation structure collapsed under external colonial pressure
Swiss LandsgemeindeSwitzerland, 13th century+Open-air direct democracy; still functional in two Swiss cantons today; extraordinary longevity; very high legitimacy because every adult participates directlyDifficult to scale beyond small communities; mob dynamics risk
Kibbutz ModelIsrael, early 20th centuryComplete economic equality; communal child-rearing; demonstrated sustained viability; peak period produced extraordinary agricultural and cultural outputSecond-generation member retention; burnout from mandatory communal labor; evolved into less radical forms by 1980s

5. Warning Signs of Emerging Tyranny

Groups that survive the initial crisis often fail 6–18 months later when a capable, charismatic leader consolidates power. Recognize these patterns early — they become nearly impossible to reverse after 6 months of entrenchment.

Information control: Leader or inner circle is the only source of outside information. Radio communications are managed exclusively by one person who summarizes rather than shares raw content.
Appointment creep: Roles that were supposed to rotate are "too important to change right now." The leader has been in place for multiple full terms without rotation.
Selective enforcement: Rules apply differently to the leader's allies than to others. Infractions by inner circle members are quietly handled "internally."
Resource asymmetry: The leader or council members eat better, sleep better, or work less than average members, beyond reasonable differences for essential role performance.
Criticism suppression: People report hesitation to raise concerns in public meetings. Criticism of the leader is reframed as "morale threat" or "security risk."
Preemptive loyalty tests: Members are asked to demonstrate loyalty before receiving information or resources. Informers are rewarded.
Security force loyalty: Security personnel are selected for personal loyalty to the leader rather than competence, and their conduct is held to different standards.
Healthy sign: Leader is the first to acknowledge their own errors publicly.
Healthy sign: Any member can request a council session to raise grievances without retaliation.
Healthy sign: Decisions are explained with reasoning, not just issued as commands.
Healthy sign: Leaders rotate or face periodic votes of confidence on schedule.

Recall & Removal Mechanisms

Write these procedures into your charter BEFORE you need them:

  1. Petition: Any member can initiate a recall petition. Petition requires 20% of full members to sign to trigger a review hearing.
  2. Review hearing: Conducted by all council members except the subject. Subject presents their case. Witnesses may speak. Confidential vote.
  3. Removal threshold: 2/3 supermajority of council removes from role. Role reverts to interim appointment or new election.
  4. Emergency removal: If council determines an active, imminent threat from leader, temporary suspension pending full hearing — by unanimous vote of remaining council members.
  5. Succession procedure: Immediately after removal, the remaining council appoints an interim role-holder using established succession order (written in charter).

6. Laws & Justice

Conflict Resolution — Mediation Before Judgment

Most disputes can be resolved without formal judgment. Reserve the formal process for failures of mediation. Sequence:

  1. Direct resolution — parties attempt to resolve themselves within 24 hours
  2. Mediation — neutral third party (not in dispute, not a close ally of either party) facilitates a structured conversation: each party states their position; mediator restates it back; parties identify shared interests; propose solutions; agree or not
  3. Council review — if mediation fails, council hears the case within 3 days. Both parties present. Witnesses may speak. Council deliberates privately. Renders a decision with written reasoning.
  4. Appeal — one appeal permitted. Requires new information not presented at original hearing. Heard by full group meeting if council cannot reach agreement.
Community Conflict Resolution Flowchart Flowchart showing the four-step community conflict resolution process: direct resolution, mediation, council review, and appeal or community vote. CONFLICT REPORTED Document in writing; notify both parties STEP 1: Direct Resolution Parties attempt to resolve privately — 24 hours If children/danger involved, skip to Step 3 Resolved? (both parties agree) YES RESOLVED Document NO STEP 2: Mediation Neutral mediator — neither party's ally Structured session: state positions → find shared interest → agree Resolved? (binding agreement?) YES RESOLVED + Written record NO STEP 3: Council Review 3-person neutral panel · Both parties present Witnesses · Written decision with reasoning · One appeal Binding Decision → Document → Implement Failure to comply = council escalation. Charter amendment requires supermajority. 24 hrs 3 days 7 days ← Escalation timeline
Community conflict resolution process — designed to de-escalate before formal judgment. Most disputes should resolve at Steps 1 or 2. Document every stage in writing. The council serves the community, not the parties — its first job is to preserve group cohesion while achieving justice.

Evidence Standards

Punishment Philosophy

Offense TypePreferred ResponseRationale
Minor disputes (property, labor allocation)Mediation; compensation to injured party; written recordRestorative — most efficient, preserves relationships, low cost
Rules violation (minor theft, deception)Council hearing; formal warning; increased work contribution; probationCorrective — gives opportunity to demonstrate change
Serious violation (assault, significant theft)Council hearing; suspension of privileges; possible expulsion from role; community serviceDeterrent + remedial
Capital offense (rape, premeditated murder, deliberate endangerment)Council hearing; exile or, in extreme cases with no safe exile option, permanent confinement; death only if escape or confinement is impossible and ongoing threat is clearGroup protection paramount; avoid killing if any alternative exists
On Capital Punishment: Post-collapse, you have no prisons. The two real options are exile or execution. Exile is almost always preferable — it removes the threat without requiring your community to live with having killed someone. Exile to death-certain environment functions as execution. Reserve execution for cases where the individual is an immediate ongoing physical threat and exile is impossible (e.g., severe injury preventing them from leaving, or your perimeter cannot be secured against their return).

Exile — When and How

7. Property Rights

The Spectrum

Pure communism (everything shared equally) and pure individualism (each person owns all they hold) both fail under stress. Historical successful communities use a hybrid:

CategoryOwnership ModelRationale
Critical infrastructure (water source, perimeter, shelter)CommunityNo individual ownership prevents free-rider problem and ownership disputes that fragment the group
Tools, livestock, vehiclesCommunity with assigned custodyTracked to individual for accountability, but cannot be withheld from group need
Food stores (main)Community allocationIndividual hoarding destroys group cohesion; equitable distribution is survival requirement
Personal reservePrivate (declared)Human dignity; motivation to produce; prevents demoralization; small declared reserve reduces black market formation
Personal items (clothing, photographs, religious items)Fully privateInvasion of these is a morale catastrophe; not worth any resource gain
LandCustodial use rights, not ownershipProperty title means nothing without enforcement; assign use rights (cultivated land stays with the cultivator while in use) rather than permanent ownership. Document in registry.
Knowledge and skillsIndividual, with community obligation to teachNo one owns their knowledge, but they are not slaves to share it — incentivize teaching through recognition and trade goods

Land Dispute Prevention

Land becomes contentious when stakes become high. Prevent disputes by establishing clear rules early:

  1. Survey and map the land within the community's area of operation as early as possible.
  2. Assign cultivation zones in the community register with names of responsible cultivators and date assigned.
  3. Establish the rule: uncultivated land can be claimed by any member who commits to working it; land actively cultivated cannot be reassigned without council agreement and compensation.
  4. Review land assignments annually. Abandoned plots revert to community allocation.

8. Trade & Economics

What Actually Holds Value Post-Collapse

The common belief is that gold and silver become the currency of collapse. This is true eventually but not immediately. The actual value hierarchy in the first months:

Time PeriodHighest Value ItemsWhy
Week 1–4Food, water, fuel, medications, batteriesImmediate survival; no alternatives yet; original supply consumed
Month 1–6Skills (medical, mechanical, agricultural), tools, seeds, antibioticsProduction capability becomes more valuable than consumption goods
Month 6–24Durable tools, livestock, land use rights, labor hours, textilesLong-term production capability; luxury deficit sets in
Year 2+Precious metals, durable goods, alcohol, tobacco, community connectionsStore of value emerges; information networks have value

Common Units of Exchange — Historical

Barter System Design

  1. Establish a reference table — set approximate exchange ratios for common goods. 1 day of labor = X lbs of grain = Y doses of medication. Post it publicly. Update monthly based on supply/demand reality. This prevents exploitation of the uninformed.
  2. Market day — designate a specific time (weekly is common) and neutral location for inter-group and internal trading. Advance announcement allows people to prepare what they'll offer and what they need. Creates information market efficiency.
  3. Witness and record trades — significant trades (above a minimum threshold) should have a third-party witness and be recorded in the trade ledger. Prevents later "I never agreed to that" disputes.
  4. Credit system — allow deferred trades, recorded in ledger. "I'll give you 5 lbs of flour now; you'll give me 2 hrs of carpentry work next week." Requires trust and record-keeping but dramatically increases trade volume and community cooperation.
  5. Community fee — consider a small community fee (5–10% in goods) on all significant external trades. Funds community infrastructure projects and creates shared stake in market success.

Trade With Outside Groups

Preventing Hoarding & Black Markets

9. Integrating Outsiders

The Moral and Practical Framework

There is no ethically clean answer to the refugee question. Both "turn everyone away" and "admit everyone" lead to bad outcomes. The framework that works:

The Skills-to-Mouths Ratio: Every person admitted either increases or decreases your community's productive capacity per capita. The question is not "are they worthy" but "what is our current capacity, and does admitting them help or harm our survival probability and the survival probability of current members?" This is uncomfortable but honest. A community that admits so many mouths that it collapses serves no one.

Assessment Protocol for Newcomers

FactorQuestionsWeight
Critical skillsMedical training? Engineering? Food production experience? Security? Communications?High — could offset multiple "mouths"
Physical capacityHealth, age, injuries? Can they contribute to physical labor?Medium — important but not disqualifying
Social assetsDo they come with children or dependents? Do they bring relationships (trade contacts, information about the outside)?Context-dependent
Risk factorsWere they followed? Are they infected? Do they have behavioral red flags from interview?High — threat multiplier if ignored
EquipmentDo they bring tools, weapons, food, seeds, medications?Medium — valuable but not a bribe
BackgroundWhere were they before? Who can verify their account?Medium — difficult to verify, still worth asking

Children and Orphans

Establish an explicit policy before you need it:

Recommended: Unaccompanied children under age 14 receive automatic provisional admission for humanitarian reasons. The community takes collective responsibility. Assign them to an existing family unit or create a designated care structure. Children represent long-term investment — they are a workforce and next-generation community core within 5–10 years. Any community that leaves children to die outside its perimeter has made a choice about what kind of community it is.

Children with parents follow the parents' admission status. Admission of parents with children is not leverage — do not separate children from parents as a negotiating tactic.

Cultural Integration

10. Record Keeping

Why Written Records Matter

Human memory fails under stress, rationalizes self-interest, and diverges over time. Written records prevent: revisionist history; property disputes; medication dosing errors; distribution disputes; and the gradual erosion of agreed-upon rules. Without records, groups drift and fracture. Assign a record keeper as a formal role.

Archival Methods

Required Registers

11. Printable Templates

Print this page or save offline. Templates designed for paper reproduction.

Community Charter — Starter Document

Community Name: _______________________________________________
Date Founded: _______________ Location: _______________
Founding Members (sign below):
1. __________________ 2. __________________ 3. __________________
4. __________________ 5. __________________ 6. __________________

Mission Statement (what this community is for):
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________

Governance Structure: Council / Domain Meritocracy / Hybrid (circle one)
Council Members and Roles:
Medical: ___________________ Security: ___________________ Logistics: ___________________
Agriculture: ___________________ Comms: ___________________ At-Large: ___________________

Decision Rules:
Simple decisions: _____ vote majority. Major decisions (resource allocation, exile): _____ / _____ supermajority.
Emergency executive (who): ___________________ Duration before review: _____________

Non-Negotiable Rules (list, add additional below):
1. No violence against members    2. No theft from group stores    3. No sexual assault (exile)
4. _________________________________ 5. _________________________________
6. _________________________________ 7. _________________________________

Private Reserve Allowance: Each member may keep up to _____ days of personal food stores privately. Must declare to logistics officer. Undeclared stores discovered above this level = _______________

Membership process: Arrive → _____ hour observe hold → probation ___ days → full council vote
Amendments: Require _____ / _____ council vote + _____ days notice to all members before vote.

All signing members affirm they have read, understood, and agree to abide by this charter and to hold all members including themselves to its terms.

Community Skill Inventory Form

Member Name: ___________________________ Date: ___________
Age: _____ Physical limitations: ___________________________

Rate each skill: 0=None | 1=Beginner | 2=Intermediate | 3=Expert | T=Can Teach Others

CategorySkillLevel (0–3/T)Notes
MedicalBasic first aid / CPR___________________
Wound care / suturing___________________
Pharmacy / medications___________________
Obstetrics / midwifery___________________
AgricultureGarden / vegetable crops___________________
Livestock care___________________
Soil / composting___________________
EngineeringConstruction / carpentry___________________
Mechanical / vehicle repair___________________
Electrical / electronics___________________
SecurityFirearms / weapons handling___________________
Tactics / military training___________________
CommsHam radio / radio operation___________________
Navigation / maps___________________
CraftsCooking / food preservation___________________
Sewing / textiles___________________
Blacksmithing / metalwork___________________
Soap / chemistry___________________
LeadershipTeaching / instruction___________________
Conflict mediation___________________

Languages spoken: _______________________________________________
Special equipment owned/brought: ___________________________________
Medical conditions or limitations relevant to work assignment: ___________
Other skills not listed: ____________________________________________

Conflict Resolution Procedure

DISPUTE ARISES STEP 1: Direct Resolution Parties attempt to resolve themselves within 24 hours Resolved? YES RESOLVED Log if significant NO STEP 2: Mediation Neutral third party; structured conversation; written notes Resolved? YES RESOLVED Written agreement NO STEP 3: Council Hearing Formal hearing within 3 days; written decision with reasoning Timeline: 24 hrs Timeline: 48 hrs Timeline: 72 hrs

Trade Ledger — Page Template

Community: __________________ Month/Period: __________________
Date Party A Gave Party B Gave Status
Status codes: C=Complete | P=Pending | D=Disputed | V=Voided
Witness required for trades above ______ units. Record keeper initials: ______

Membership Agreement

I, _________________________________, acknowledge that I have:
□ Read or had read to me the Community Charter of ________________________
□ Understand and agree to abide by all rules therein
□ Completed my skill inventory form (attached)
□ Declared all food stores and equipment I have brought with me
□ Been informed of my probationary period of _____ days, during which I:
    • Will not have access to ____________________________________________
    • Will be assigned to ___________________ work detail
    • Will report to ___________________ as my integration mentor

I understand that the following will result in council review with possible exile:
Violence against members, theft, sexual assault, deliberate deception on security matters, refusal of work assignment without cause, and other violations as defined in the Charter.

Signed: _________________________________ Date: ___________
Witness 1: ______________________________ Witness 2: ________________________
Admitted by council vote: Y _____ / N _____ Date of full membership (if probation passed): ___________
Cross-References: Psychology & MoraleSkill Inventory ToolReference LibraryDisaster Response